検索結果をRefWorksへエクスポートします。対象は1件です。
Export
RT Book, Whole SR Electronic DC OPAC T1 The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe / by Wieland Wermke, Maija Salokangas A1 Wermke, Wieland A1 Salokangas, Maija A1 SpringerLink (Online service) YR 2021 FD 2021 SP XIII, 178 p. 22 illus., 14 illus. in color K1 Teachers -- Training of K1 International education K1 Comparative education K1 Educational sociology K1 Teaching and Teacher Education K1 International and Comparative Education K1 Sociology of Education ED 1st ed. 2021. PB Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer PP Cham SN 9783030656027 LA English (英語) CL LCC:LB1705-2286 CL DC23:370.711 NO Chapter 1. Magic Potion -- Chapter 2. Unpacking Teacher Autonomy Theoretically -- Chapter 3. Context Matters -- Chapter 4. Investigating Autonomy Empirically -- Chapter 5. Teacher Autonomy Compared -- Chapter 6. Theorizing Teacher Autonomy from a Comparative Perspective NO What do we mean when we speak about teacher autonomy? How free are teachers to go about their work? To answer these complex questions the authors asked thousands of teachers in four national contexts: in Finland, Ireland, Germany and Sweden, what they think autonomy looks like. The resulting book examines teacher autonomy theoretically and empirically, comparing teachers’ perceptions of their professional autonomy. Utilizing a mixed method approach the authors combine data from a large-scale questionnaire study, teacher interviews, lesson and meeting observations, and workshops that brought together teachers from the four participating countries. All this engagement with teachers revealed that simply increasing their professional autonomy might not lead to desired outcomes. This is because, from a teachers’ point of view, increased decision-making capacity brings further complexity and risk to their work, and it may instead lead to anxiety, self-restriction, and the eventual rejection of autonomy. These surprising conclusions challenge the increasingly orthodox view that increased autonomy is a desirable end in itself. This is what the authors call the autonomy paradox NO HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65602-7 NO 書誌ID=EB16354620; LK [E Book]https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65602-7 OL 30